San Francisco’s “Robo-Taxis” Are Causing More Than Headaches: They’re Hurting People
(Source: Flickr/waltarrrrr.)
Shortly after California granted approval for autonomous vehicle (AV) companies to expand their operations throughout San Francisco—a vote Strong Towns reported previously was delayed—one of the two principal AV companies was involved in a crash, landing its passenger in the hospital. The incident joins a litany of concerns surrounding AV performance and expansion.
The following days have had 3+ Cruise incidents reported to social media: 7/28, 7/29, 7/30, 7/31, 8/1, 8/2, 8/3, 8/4, 8/5, 8/7, 8/8, 8/9, 8/10, 8/11, 8/12, 8/13, 8/14, 8/15, 8/16, 8/17, 8/18, 8/19, 8/23, 8/24, 8/25
— Safe Street Rebel (@SafeStreetRebel) August 29, 2023
Most notably, 8/17 had 7 incidents, incl. 2 crashes
According to the SF Standard, a Cruise AV failed to yield to a fire engine rushing to an emergency on the corner of Polk and Turk streets on August 17, barely a week after the state’s vote. It’s hardly the first incident of the sort. A few days before, on August 14, AVs allegedly blocked emergency vehicles from performing lifesaving medical assistance elsewhere in San Francisco. The person in need of attention did not survive their injuries.
“All a car has to do is stop somewhere and we’re screwed,” San Francisco Fire Department Chief Jeanine Nicholson told Forbes. “Seconds matter, when it comes to an emergency. A fire can double in size in a minute, or in a medical call, an extra minute literally means more of your heart will die.”
In response to the incident, Safe Street Rebel, a largely anonymous activist group fighting for “car-free spaces, transit equity, and the end of car dominance,” noted: “All cars are potential obstructions to emergency vehicles, but especially these glitchy robot cars that cannot listen to commands from first responders. This will not be the last time a situation like this happens.”
All cars are potential obstructions to emergency vehicles, but especially these glitchy robot cars that cannot listen to commands from first responders. This will not be the last time a situation like this happens.
— Safe Street Rebel (@SafeStreetRebel) August 31, 2023
Since May 2022, the city’s fire department registered over 70 “disruptive episodes” wherein autonomous vehicles interfered with emergency vehicles. In one case, an autonomous Cruise vehicle “created an obstruction for a San Francisco Fire Department vehicle on its way to a 3-alarm fire,” and in another, The Verge reported the autonomous vehicle “ran over a fire hose that was in use at an active fire scene.” For weeks, the San Francisco Fire Department has been demanding that Cruise and Waymo be regulated far more stringently.
First responders haven’t been the only ones frustrated with driverless cars. A day after the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) gave Cruise and Waymo the greenlight to charge fares and operate 24/7 in a 3–1 vote, a dozen AVs came to a collective halt on a busy San Francisco street. In a statement, Cruise attributed the “complete meltdown” to connectivity issues stemming from a nearby music festival. Another AV drove into wet cement at an active construction site just a few days later. Earlier this year, a Waymo driverless car fatally struck a dog, and dozens of separate episodes—from traffic jams to close-calls—in recent months even culminated in a guerrilla protest.
Welcome to Week of Cone
— Safe Street Rebel (@SafeStreetRebel) July 5, 2023
On Thurs 7/13, the CPUC will vote to expand AVs in SF. Cruise & Waymo promise they’ll reduce traffic & collisions, but we know that’s not true. They block busses & emergency vehicles, create more traffic, and are a surveillance nightmare.
But there’s hope pic.twitter.com/K7e0C2nhuq
Even though the most recent collision prompted the California Department of Motor Vehicles to reduce Cruise’s active fleet by half, from 400 to 200, San Francisco still hosts more AVs than any other city in the country, “making it ground zero for a nascent technology that’s been in development for years and is just now beginning to operate at scale.”
The city itself has been wrestling for control over what goes on its streets, alleging the CPUC “abused” its decision-making power when it gave AVs the green light. The city’s attorney filed a motion requesting the state stop the “immediate implementation of unlimited expansion of automated vehicles.” If denied, the city vowed to look into other ways of challenging the expansion of AVs on its streets.
Despite their flimsy reputation, AV spokespeople like Cruise’s Drew Pusateri insist driverless cars “positively impact overall road safety” in contrast to injuries and fatalities caused by human drivers. For the companies and their supporters, the ratio of incidents to trips taken is comparably negligible.
However, for many of their detractors, that point is moot. Concentrating on autonomous vehicle technologies is not only a costly way to invent new risks—as observed in San Francisco—but it fundamentally misses the opportunity to orient our cities away from car dependency.
As a recent piece in Transportation For America concluded: “[AVs] will not free people from increasingly long trips to reach their essential destinations. [They] will not relieve people of the financial burden of car ownership. And [they] will not change the dangerous design of our roadways, which encourages high vehicle speeds at the cost of pedestrian safety.”
Editor’s Note: This article shares a now-rescinded allegation that Cruise AVs blocked emergency vehicles from performing lifesaving medical assistance, resulting in the death of a person struck by a separate non-AV vehicle on August 14, 2023. On September 12, 2023, the San Francisco Fire Department issued an update asserting that AVs did not interfere with first responders.
Asia (pronounced “ah-sha”) Mieleszko serves as a Staff Writer for Strong Towns. A dilettante urbanist since adolescence, she's excited to convert a lifetime of ad-hoc volunteerism into a career. Her unconventional background includes directing a Ukrainian folk choir, pioneering synaesthetic performances, photographing festivals, designing websites, teaching, and ghostwriting. She can be found wherever Wi-Fi is reliable, typically along Amtrak's Northeast Corridor.